Gospel According to St. Matthew, The (1964)

Powerful yet poetic, this is one of the great filmed stories of Jesus Christ.

Rating: 4.5 out of 5.

Review #1,086

Dir. Pier Paolo Pasolini
1964 | Italy | Drama/Biography/History | 131 mins | 1.66:1 | Italian

PG (passed clean)

Cast: Enrique Irazoqui, Margherita Caruso, Susanna Pasolini
Plot: Pasolini’s version of Matthew’s Gospel was shot in natural settings with non-professional actors, forsaking mythic grandeur in favor of a depiction that emphasizes the political radicalism of Christ’s life, and with a visual style that drew from documentary and Renaissance painting alike.
Awards: Won OCIC Award and Special Jury Prize (Venice); Nom. for 3 Oscars – Best Art Direction, Best Costume Design, Best Adapted Music

Source: Compass Film

Accessibility Index
Subject Matter: Moderate – Christianity, Faith, Politics
Narrative Style: Slightly Complex
Pace: Slightly Slow
Audience Type: General Arthouse

Viewed: The Arts House – Pasolini Retrospective
First Published: 8 Oct 2014
Spoilers: No

There’s something uniquely powerful in The Gospel According to St. Matthew, one of the great filmed stories of Jesus Christ, and possibly the most poetic. 

Made only three years after Italian poet-turned-director Pier Paolo Pasolini begun his filmmaking journey with Accattone (1961) and Mama Roma (1962), Gospel has often been regarded as perhaps his greatest achievement, even if in retrospect it sticks out as an anomaly in the director’s short, impressive but ultimately provocative body of work. 

Named as one of forty-five ‘great films’ ever made, by the Vatican no less, Gospel is a safe, traditional rendition of the story of Christ.  Pasolini, so often critical of the Church and the State in his other films like The Decameron (1971), imbues a sense of warmth, gentle grace and historicity to the narrative.

The screenplay, full of vigour and wisdom, functions as a poem for all ages; it is the hymn of life, but not without its well-documented suffering.

According to Pasolini, he was an unbeliever but had nostalgia for a belief.  His vision is not one of epic grandeur, though his painterly imageries might suggest otherwise. 

Instead, Gospel works as a meditation, accompanied by the classical pieces of Beethoven and others, with some additional evocative music adapted by Luis Bacalov.  It is at once a religious experience and a cinematic one. 

“Many are called, but few are chosen.”

For me as a non-believer, I find the film superbly crafted, but more importantly, it feels inclusive and accessible.  The things I have heard about Christ’s story – his birth, journey, healing powers, and ultimately his crucifixion and resurrection, are chronicled in Gospel

There’s even an extraordinary scene of Jesus (as played by Spanish economics student Enrique Irazoqui who met Pasolini at a political event) walking on water. 

The balance of poeticism,  and in some sequences, documentary-like realism by Pasolini serves the film’s elegant yet immersive style.  Whether Gospel is a faithful depiction of its source, I’m in no position to comment. 

But it does appear that Christ is being portrayed as a revolutionary, with a strong cause and a stoic determination to change people’s beliefs. 

Through Irazoqui’s dramatic, sometimes intense, performance, it is easy for any person (or screen character) to fall into two camps – a believer of a profound man of wisdom, or a skeptic of a false prophet. 

Perhaps this divide is still symbolic today.  In any case, Pasolini still sees Christ as a loving man, who has humanity’s interests at heart.  Gospel remains faith-affirming, if not life-affirming.  If you love deeply, you sacrifice deeply.

Grade: A  




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s