Scott’s follow-up to ‘Prometheus’ is a full-scale R-rated blockbuster that will thrill mainstream adult audiences, maybe even fans, but it doesn’t hold a candle to the sheer filmmaking prowess of the first two ‘Alien’ films.
Continue reading →
Scott’s follow-up to ‘Prometheus’ is a full-scale R-rated blockbuster that will thrill mainstream adult audiences, maybe even fans, but it doesn’t hold a candle to the sheer filmmaking prowess of the first two ‘Alien’ films.
It goes through its storytelling beats without fuss but also without invention, though all that becomes insignificant when you are in the cockpit of a fighter jet in what could be the most immersive blockbuster to be shot aerially since Dunkirk.
The movie that launched the popular action franchise is rather uninspired despite having De Palma at the helmโaction is few and far between and the conversational scenes feel lacklustre.
Ridley Scott is back in some style with this largely captivating stranded-in-Mars sci-fi adventure that is a potent mix of science and thrills.ย ย
One of Marvelโs most visually fascinating movies to date, but certainly not one (or two) of their finest hours.
At times packing visual panache yet also feeling run-of-the-mill in terms of plotting, Sam Raimiโs return to the superhero genre is welcoming but non-essential.
Boyle, Sorkin, Fassbender and Winslet deliver some of their best work in this talky if invigorating three-act โcinematic theatreโ centering on the Apple co-founder.
As a swords-and-sandals biblical epic, it is fairly spectacular, but remotely engaging.
This may be minor Spielberg, but its wholeheartedness makes it worth the trip to the JFK airport in New York where an Eastern European man is stuck without citizenship, played with earnest charm by Tom Hanks.
Soderberghโs take pales in comparison to Tarkovskyโs superior 1972 adaptationโit feels too cold and lacklustre overall though it does grow more inwardly emotional by its final act.ย ย ย ย