Spielberg’s journalistic procedural is a masterclass in supple filmmaking that is equally at ease portraying nuance as well as galvanising action.

Review #1,534
Dir. Steven Spielberg
2017 | USA | Drama/History | 116 mins | 1.85:1 | English
PG13 (passed clean) for language and brief war violence
Cast: Meryl Streep, Tom Hanks
Plot: A cover-up that spanned four U.S. Presidents pushed the country’s first female newspaper publisher and a hard-driving editor to join an unprecedented battle between the press and the government.
Awards: Nom. for 2 Oscars – Best Picture, Best Leading Actress
Distributor: United International Pictures
Accessibility Index
Subject Matter: Moderate – Journalism, Truth, Politics
Narrative Style: Slightly Complex
Pace: Normal
Audience Type: Slightly Mainstream
Viewed: In Theatres
First Published: 28 Jan 2018
Spoilers: No
I have heard of Watergate but not about the Pentagon Papers. I also love discovering history and politics through cinema. And I absolutely love Steven Spielberg.
So you must sense my excitement when the stars aligned (also quite literally with Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks leading the charge) for this prestige project that is at once a quasi-biopic on Katharine Graham, the owner of The Washington Post, and a lesson about a controversial part of US political history that draws parallels with the country’s current climate.
Shot and produced in less than six months with unbelievable speed by a veteran filmmaker who is also a born storyteller, The Post echoes and honours the spirit of investigative journalism’s quick-thinking, puzzle-piecing heroes, operating as a procedural that shows us the tension of meeting deadlines and making huge (and praying that they aren’t egregious) decisions.
Streep personifies Katharine in an unexpectedly subtle but affecting performance, with Hanks as Ben Bradlee, the newspaper’s witty if uncompromising editor.
“Do you have the Papers?”
As a source tips Ben’s team on the leak of a top-secret study about the Vietnam War, both Ben and Katharine need to come to terms of the magnitude of their discovery, setting their emotions and values against the stark realities of law, corporate legacy, and possible personal ruination.
In the tradition of time-ticking thrillers, particularly of the ‘70s espionage movies (the film’s setting in 1971 certainly calls upon those pictures), The Post is, however, Spielberg-lite in serious fashion.
It doesn’t come close to his 2000s masterpiece, Munich (2005), for an exemplar of that type of filmmaking, but his latest is still a masterclass in another kind of moviemaking style—the supple kind.
Here, Spielberg shows that he is equally at ease portraying nuance as well as galvanising action. He shifts gears up and down, creating a film of undulating rhythm, one that is almost too smooth and polished to afford any raw, organic moments.
Save for Streep’s highly-nuanced work, which some might argue strives for organicity, much of The Post is workmanlike, like the printing press itself. This is perhaps a discredit (or credit) to Spielberg’s familiar sleight-of-hand. In any case, it is an excellent companion piece to 2016 Best Picture Oscar winner, Spotlight, and All the President’s Men (1976).
Grade: A-
Trailer:
Music:
[…] of music, there is little in the way of John Williams (his first for Spielberg since 2017’s The Post) to really excite or touch the heartstrings. I’m quite surprised that Spielberg used him more […]
LikeLike