Both plot and action-heavy, this stands as a deceptively solid middle film of the new trilogy.
Dir. Rian Johnson
2017 | USA | Sci-Fi/Action/Adventure | 152 mins | 2.39:1 | English
PG (passed clean) for sequences of sci-fi action and violence
Cast: Daisy Ridley, John Boyega, Mark Hamill, Carrie Fisher, Adam Driver, Oscar Issac, Andy Serkis, Kelly Marie Tran, Laura Dern
Plot: Rey develops her newly discovered abilities with the guidance of Luke Skywalker, who is unsettled by the strength of her powers. Meanwhile, the Resistance prepares to do battle with the First Order.
Awards: Nom. for 4 Oscars – Best Original Score, Best Visual Effects, Best Sound Mixing, Best Sound Editing
Distributor: Walt Disney Studios
Subject Matter: Moderate
Narrative Style: Slightly Complex
Audience Type: Mainstream
Viewed: In Theatres
First Published: 25 Dec 2017
As a Star Wars movie, The Last Jedi appears to be a satisfying entry—longest runtime in the series (i.e. suggests something truly epic), rave reviews for the film being bold enough to chart a different course under Rian Johnson (yes, he single-handedly wrote the screenplay), and almost end-to-end battles amid some mythologizing and emotionally-tinged moments that will give fans the goosebumps.
All these should work, and then some, but somehow the film feels like a deception—it appears to be better than it is. Quite the irony that the idea of deception also figures prominently in the movie, as if to blatantly illustrate the point.
The Last Jedi is built to be a cinematic experience (in IMAX 3D, it is truly spectacular), and certainly there are no compromises in the technical craftwork on display here.
But from a plotting point-of-view, there are some misgivings, some unforgivable, some mildly agitating. I find it hard to enjoy a film that doesn’t quite raise any stakes narratively (it merely does so through the time-tested, time-ticking technique of parallel editing), where anything can happen.
This is not a case of unpredictability, which is the very foundation of great storytelling, but of sheer predictability by means of the film’s reliance on one too many last-minute interventions.
“Let the past die. Kill it, if you have to. That’s the only way to become what you are meant to be.”
The only risk-taking the film offers is Johnson’s off-the-beaten-track take on a Star Wars movie, effectively opening new paths to (continue) to tell what feels like a cyclical saga of light versus dark, and of generational lineage, in a different way.
His intention is laudable, but the process to which the characters (good or evil) are manipulated to achieve his vision is questionable. Johnson has a clear sight of the big picture, but he makes problematic decisions with plotting and character motivations.
For example, one of the new trilogy’s most fascinating characters, Snoke (Andy Serkis), teased so frighteningly in The Force Awakens (2015), isn’t given enough time to live up to his potential.
The Last Jedi also feels overdrawn—a tedious 20-minute plus mid-sequence involving a trip by two supporting characters to find someone who could break an important code so that the movie could move forward should have been cut or reimagined in a less superfluous light.
I think there’s something fundamentally not right with Johnson’s screenplay in relation to how things develop and play out—they either don’t make sense or feel conspicuously odd.
That being said, fans who are vehemently against the film are just mad (in more ways than one). But fans who try to rationalise the film’s greatness are also missing the point… that however entertaining or ‘groundbreaking’ the movie is, its greatest mistake is to confuse plausibility with possibility.